50 F. high in the Twin Cities yesterday.
51 F. average high on October 31.
40 F. high on October 31, 2014.
.33" rain fell at MSP International Airport yesterday.
November 1, 2000:
An F1 tornado touched down on a farm east of Prinsburg in Kandiyohi
County destroying a small storage shed. It also tipped another shed on
its side, and ripped off a portion of the roof of a third shed.
November 1, 1999:
High winds were reported in central Minnesota. The St. Cloud State
University Meteorology Department in Stearns county recorded a 65 mph
gust. Morris AWOS in Stevens county, posted a 62 mph gust and Willmar
AWOS in Kandiyohi county recorded a 59 mph gust. Area wide sustained
winds of 40 mph occurred, with gusts in the 45 to 50 mph range.
November 1, 1991:
Classes were canceled across the state due to the Halloween Blizzard.
Three foot drifts across I-94 from the Twin Cities to St. Cloud.
November Shirtsleeves
Streak of 60s, 70F Midweek?
"November
always seemed to me the Norway of the year" wrote Emily Dickinson.
Perhaps Denmark or northern Germany would be a better metaphor this
year.
El Nino-warmed winds from the Pacific are slowing our
free-fall into winter, like the smoking brakes of an 18-wheeler truck
creeping downhill. There's little doubt November will bring heavy
jackets, the first accumulating snow of the winter season and
mostly-frozen ground by Thanskgiving. If Canada were to run out of cold
fronts the implications for the planet would be stark.
But
November 2015 will launch on a positively balmy note, feeling more like
late September. Models almost unanimously boost high temperatures into
the 60s from today into
Wednesday,
in fact I'm predicting a few 70s by midweek - in some cases 20 to 30F
warmer than average - an "average" that continues to warm over time.
Expect
plenty of sun the next 4 days; light jackets in the morning,
shirt-sleeves by early afternoon. A cooler front sparks showers on
Thursday with highs stuck in the 40s next weekend.
No blistering arctic attacks brewing just yet.
November Mild Spell.
Models are all in tight agreement showing highs near 60F today; well
into the 60s Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. 70F isn't out of the
question Tuesday and Wednesday from the Twin Cities on south and east.
Pretty remarkable considering average highs now are in the upper 40s.
Source: NOAA and Aeris Enterprise.
Most Significant Rains Stay South.
Here is the 240-hour GFS forecast, showing a streak of heavy rain from
New Orleans and Little Rock into the Carolinas, more heavy rain soaking
the Pacific Northwest, where many rivers are already out of their banks.
GFS guidance: NOAA and AerisWeather.
November Temperature Anomalies.
Here is the latest guidance from NOAA's CFS model showing average
November temperatures as much as 2-3F warmer than average east of the
Mississippi River.
Mild Bias Continues?
El Nino may begin to weaken in early 2016, but a more persistent and
powerful prevailing wind flow from the Pacific is forecast to keep much
of North America milder than average; the only exception Texas as an
energized southerly branch of the jet pulls a parade of storms across
the Deep South. At least on paper, in theory. Results may vary. December
- February outlook: NOAA NMME model.
Truly Frightening. 13 Photos That Perfectly Capture the Halloween Blizzard of 1991. Aaah, the memories. Check out a pictorial review that may send shivers up your spine, courtesy of
The Star Tribune. Odds are we'll never see another storm of that magnitude so early in the season in our lifetime.
First Measurable Autumn Snowfall. Dr. Mark Seeley has more details on our midweek snow event at
Minnesota WeatherTalk,
the first of the season for the immediate Twin Cities metro, just
enough to remind all of us that winter is, in fact, on the way: "
Wednesday
and Thursday, October 28-29 brought the first measurable snowfalls of
the autumn season to Minnesota, although most observers reported a
mixture of precipitation, both rain and snow, with temperatures hovering
in the low to mid 30s F. Many observers reported from 0.1 to 0.4
inches, including Rochester with 0.2 inches which tied the record value
there for October 28th. Long Prairie (Todd County), Montgomery (Le
Sueur County), and Cass Lake (Cass County) reported 0.5 inches, Grand
Rapids 0.7 inches, and Eau Claire, WI reported 0.9 inches. Rothsay
(Wilkin County) reported 1 inch of snow (tying the record from 1964),
while just north of Brainerd an observer reported 2.2 inches of new snow..."
Destructive Cyclone Chapala Threatens Yemen, Oman. It's highly unusual to have a hurricane this intense in the Arabian Sea - here's an excerpt from The Weather Channel: "
Cyclone
Chapala became the strongest tropical system so far south in the
Arabian Sea on record and may make an unprecedented landfall at
hurricane strength along the coast of Yemen or southwest Oman in the
days ahead. Chapala rapidly intensified and had estimated winds as
strong as a high-end Category 4 early Friday. Some further decrease in intensity are expected over the next day or so as the system gradually weakens..."
Image credit: UW-CIMSS.
Three Years Later, Are We Ready for the Next Sandy? Picking up on the same theme of resilience and readiness,
New York Magazine takes a look; here's an excerpt: "
Hurricane Sandy struck three years ago today, flooding the coasts of New York and New Jersey and, unforgettably, putting out the lights in half of Manhattan. And unless you were directly affected by it, it's pretty easy to forget,
or at least not think about it. But it's not if you're still trying to
rebuild, as many people are. This spring, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency began a review of 17,000 Hurricane Sandy–related
disaster claims. According to ABC News,
the resulting report found that roughly three in five were still owed
money. Some people are waiting for more than $100,000, and FEMA is
trying to fix the problem by doling out additional reimbursements, at an
average of $15,000..." (File image above: NASA).
East Coast and Gulf Coast Power Grids Are Still Not Ready for a Big Hurricane. Grist takes a look at the grid and discovers it isn't ready for The Big One. Shocking. Here's a clip: "...So,
you might think maybe it’s high time we get our catastrophic-weather
act together? Well, earlier this week, The Union of Concerned Scientists
(UCS) released a study showing that most of the power grid on the Gulf
and East Coasts of the United States would not be prepared for another
Category 3 hurricane. Inside Climate News reports:
In all, 68 power plants and 415 major electric power substations are
susceptible to flooding in a Category 3 hurricane, a storm with
sustained winds up to 130 mph..."
Photo credit above: "
Water pushed up by Hurricane Sandy splashes into the window of a building in Bellport, N.Y."
REUTERS/Lucas Jackson.
Antarctic Ozone Hole Expands to Near-Record Size. Here's the latest from
USA TODAY: "
The
Antarctic ozone hole widened to one of its largest sizes on record
earlier this month, the U.N.'s World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
announced Thursday. The hole's large size was due to unusually cold
temperatures in the stratosphere, the level of the atmosphere where the
ozone hole and ozone layer are located, the agency said. "This shows us
that the ozone hole problem is still with us and we need to remain
vigilant. But there is no reason for undue alarm," Geir Braathen, a
senior scientist in WMO's Atmospheric and Environment Research Division,
said in a statement..." (Image credit: NASA).
South Dakota Scientist Says USDA Censored Pesticide Research. Here's an excerpt from
The Star Tribune: "
A
highly regarded federal scientist filed a whistleblower complaint
Wednesday against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), charging
that he was punished for publicizing research showing a link between
pesticides and the decline in bees and other pollinators. Jonathan
Lundgren, a USDA entomologist in Brookings, S.D., said in civil service
documents that while the agency did not stop publication of the
research, supervisors harassed him, tried to stop him from speaking out,
and interfered with new projects..."
Image credit above: Michael Reilly, ASSOCIATED PRESS - AP. "
A
highly regarded federal scientist filed a whistleblower complaint
Wednesday against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), charging
that he was punished for publicizing research showing a link between
pesticides and the decline in bees."
2015 Tesla Model S P90D With "Ludicrous Mode".
First Test Review. I'm just amazed that Elon Musk was able to get
"Ludicrous Mode" (0 to 60 in 2.6 seconds) past the lawyers. Wow. Here's
an excerpt of a review at
Motor Trend: "
Stop
what you're doing right now. Stop texting. Get off YouTube, close
Facebook, and pause for a moment so you can truly appreciate the times
we're living in, a world where if you have the means you can go out and
buy an American-made, 762-hp, all-wheel-drive electric car that's as
capable of driving itself as it is smoking supercars off the line. That
car is the new Ludicrous-enhanced 2015 Tesla Model S P90D..."
What Americans Fear Most, According to Their Google Search Histories.
After reading Ted Koppel's chilling new book I'm paranoid about the
lights staying on and the grid staying up. That's at the top of my uh-oh
list. Here's an excerpt from TIME: "...For Americans, the biggest fear, apparently, is corruption of government officials, according to a recent survey.
(Other biggies from that study included cyber-terrorism, economic
collapse and corporate tracking of personal information. Basically,
we’re all really paranoid.) But actually, when you use the
super-scientific metric of Google searches, Americans are mostly afraid
of things like God, heights and other people..."
TODAY: Partly sunny, mild breeze. Winds: S 10-15. High: 63
SUNDAY NIGHT: Partly cloudy. Low: 47
MONDAY: Mix of clouds and sun, very nice. High: 66
TUESDAY: Blue sky, warm winds. Wake-up: 51. High: near 70
WEDNESDAY: Is this November? September flashback with lukewarm sun. Wake-up: 57. High: 72
THURSDAY: Cooler, growing chance of showers. Wake-up: 47. High: 52
FRIDAY: Slow clearing, jacket weather returns. Wake-up: 39. High: 47
SATURDAY: Mostly cloudy, feels like November. Winds: E 5-10. Wake-up: 33. High: 45
Climate Stories...
These 4 Republican Senators are Forming at Group to Tackle Climate Change. I almost fell off my couch when I saw this story move on the wires; here's the intro from
ThinkProgress: "
The
environment just got a boost from an unlikely source: Senate
Republicans. Four senators — Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), Lamar Alexander
(R-TN), Mark Kirk (R-IL), and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) — formed a Senate
Energy and Environment Working Group this week that, according to Ayotte’s office,
will “focus on ways we can protect our environment and climate while
also bolstering clean energy innovation that helps drive job creation.”
The group will meet semi-regularly to discuss environmental issues and
talk about potential legislative ways to address them..."
File photo credit above: AP Photo/M. Spencer Green. "In
this June 9, 2014 file photo, U.S. Sen. Mark Kirk R-Ill., speaks during
an interview in his office on third quarter fundraising, in Chicago."
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uVyw-0ESOVpQL00MGeE5gpeMEcaHMwCyz_O12lyISovVgI3T7-0qlcH7AR3-wLZeowgZg1tRIV_kFwYMnsxQdLiC9JVDI4x33wJMn2i0h4khIREMJB9bJafdAMvZV9NEJU1Y87z9WauDsnIoyX=s0-d)
This Chart Shows Where All U.S. Presidential Candidates Stand on the World's Biggest Issue. Here's a link and story excerpt from Mother Jones and
Newsweek: "
At
first glance, there are just two groups of presidential contenders when
it comes to climate change: those who think it's real and urgent, and
those who don't. But take a closer look, and the picture blurs. The
matrix above depicts subtle differences, at least in the Republican
field, in the extent to which the candidates believe the science and
want to act on it. Of course, selecting each set of coordinates wasn't
an exact science—many of the White House hopefuls have a history of
confused and contradictory statements on the issue. But here's a short
analysis of the candidates' positions on global warming and an
explanation of how we came up with this graph..."
Graphic credit: James West/Climate Desk.
Drought Swaying Opinions on Global Warming. The Columbian
has the story - here's an excerpt: "Severe drought affecting many parts
of the nation is convincing skeptics of global warming to reconsider
their position on the matter. For the first time since 2008, 7 out of 10
Americans indicate that there is solid evidence of global warming,
according to a report from the National Surveys on Energy and
Environment. This is a 10 percent increase from last fall and just
behind the record 72 percent in 2008. More than 60 percent of those who
believe global warming evidence cite severe drought as having a “very
large effect” on their stance. Dr. Nancy Selover, the state
climatologist for Arizona, said there is good science supporting the
public’s belief in global warming..."
Climate Change and Creation Care.
As I dig into how United States faith communities are responding to
climate change I am noticing that there is a very concerted effort to
care for creation and a focus specifically on climate change. An example
of this is the United Methodist Women’s national office has made
climate justice one of its four social justice priorities.
Would
you like to explore where your faith intersections with weather and
climate change? On Saturday, November 7th at 9a in Prior Lake, Shepherd
of the Lake Lutheran Church is hosting a Creation Care event that will
examine the intersection of faith, climate change and weather. The event
is free. Childcare is provided for those that RSVP. Presenters include
faith leaders from the Lutheran, Methodist, MCC and Catholic church, Dr.
John Abraham (climate scientist from the University of St. Thomas) and
me. RSVP at:
http://www.sollc.org/creationcare.
How Exxon Overstates the Uncertainty in Climate Science. Here's an excerpt of the latest installment of a series at
InsideClimate News: "...
Testing people's reaction to one such complicated graph,
Rosemarie McMahon and two other Zurich experts found that the
test-takers commonly missed the point. People didn't see that our
choices, not the models, will determine how much warming we are in for.
The result, says an article they published in the journal Climatic
Change, is "a misguided perception that climate science is too uncertain
to play any significant role in policy decisions." If the researchers
found many of their test subjects utterly befuddled by the graph, Cohen
did little to clarify things. His point in highlighting that particular
chart was to emphasize scientific uncertainty, an approach Exxon has
pursued for decades..."
Graph credit above: "
Exxon
spokesman Ken Cohen either misunderstood or misrepresented the chart
pictured above as he pushed back against an InsideClimate News
investigation into what Exxon's own scientists knew about the emerging
risks of climate change, and when they knew it."
Fossil Fuel Companies Aren't Just Bad for the Climate - They're Bad Investments. Grist makes the case; here's the intro: "
Activists
often use moral language when advocating for divestment from fossil
fuel companies: It is wrong to participate in the destruction of our
planet, say college students and the parishioners of liberal churches.
We should express our disapproval by divesting, they argue,
and help to build momentum for carbon regulation and cleaner energy
sources. But what if fossil fuels are just bad investments? What if oil,
gas, and coal companies have sunk billions of dollars into buying up
the rights to carbon fuels that they will never actually be able to
extract? That’s what a growing band of financiers argue, and the people
who follow their investment advice are benefiting from it..."
Buy Coal Now!
Should climate-concerned billionaires pay up to keep remaining coal in
the ground - indefinitely? Here's an excerpt of a story at
The Atlantic: "...
Most
climate regulations focus on making it more expensive to emit
greenhouse gases. The cap-and-trade systems run by both the European
Union and, soon, China
take this approach: The thing they’re capping and trading is emissions.
Frost believes that instead of regulating to limit the burning of
fossil fuels, we should just never remove the fuels from earth’s crust
in the first place. Coal-fired power plants release about 40 percent of global carbon emissions and are a frequent target
of climate policies. Frost thinks we should pay the organizations which
own underground coal deposits—specifically, the U.S. government—for the
right to never mine it..."
Illustration credit above:
Stephanie Shafer.
No comments:
Post a Comment