78 F. maximum temperature yesterday in the Twin Cities.
81 F. average high on August 15.
82 F. high on August 15, 2016.
It's Not Your Imagination: It's Trending Wetter
Is this a good time to remind you that the last 12 months have been the wettest on record? Twin Cities statistics go back to 1837. 40.72 inches of rain fell from August 2016 to July 2017.
Is this a good time to remind you that the last 12 months have been the wettest on record? Twin Cities statistics go back to 1837. 40.72 inches of rain fell from August 2016 to July 2017.
That's
well above the latest 30-year average for annual MSP rainfall of 31
inches. Which is 20 percent wetter than the 1941-1970 rainfall average
of 26 inches.
Dr.
Mark Seeley shared these records with me, underscoring our new reality:
it's trending wetter over time. A warmer atmosphere can hold more water
vapor, fueling heavier rains and warm season T-storms. That's not a
climate model - that's staring out at the water in a rain gauge.
NOAA
models print out as much as 1 to 3 inches of rain today and tonight as
the latest stormy swirl pushes across the state. Typical for May; a
little odd for mid-August.
The
first half of the month has been about 3F cooler than average, but
computer guidance shows a warming trend. No sweaty spell of 90s, but 80s
should be fairly common from this weekend into Labor Day.
Check out the blog for running updates on cloud cover forecasts for Monday's eclipse.
Wednesday Soaker.
1-2" of rain will fall across much of central and east central
Minnesota into northwest Wisconsin, with as much as 3"+ in a few
communities. I could see some minor flash flooding on area highways by
Wednesday evening and night. Details via the Twin Cities National
Weather Service: "Two or three waves of rain are expected late
tonight through Wednesday night, with a few hours of dry weather between
the bouts of rain. The first batch of showers will develop late tonight
and persist into Wednesday morning. The heaviest rainfall is expected
late Wednesday afternoon through much of the night, and some areas may
have thunderstorms for a few hours."
Flash Flood Risk.
Persistent bands of showers and T-storms dropping heavy rain over the
same counties may result in rainfall amounts exceeding flash flood
limits from Minnesota and northern Iowa into western Wisconsin today.
Warm, Not Hot.
The chance of sticky heat is receding a bit for the last week of
August. I still think we'll see a few 80s, but debilitating heat should
stay well south of Minnesota through Labor Day. Twin Cities ECMWF
numbers above courtesy of WeatherBell.
Interactive Eclipse Map. NOAA NCEI has a good site with eclipse details and average cloud cover on August 21: "Our
interactive map provides greater detail about viewing the eclipse
across the nation. The map lists a “viewable” percentage for each
reporting location. The viewable percentage represents the likelihood of
skies being clear enough for the eclipse to be visible. A higher
percentage means a viewer is more likely to have a view unobstructed by
clouds. Also, a bar chart shows the probabilities for five types of
cloud cover: clear (no clouds), few, scattered, broken, and overcast.
Percentages are derived from averages of each type of cloud cover..."
Ripe for Hurricane Development? A combination of no El Nino (which tends to increase winds over the tropics, shredding developing storms before they can really get going), unusually warm ocean water and less Saharan dust than average may be setting the stage for a busy hurricane season later in August and September.
Comfortable Labor Day Northern Rockies and Upper Midwest?
Confidence levels this far out are still low, but there's every
indication (nasty) heat will linger over the southern third of the USA
and Gulf Coast into Labor Day, with real relief for the northern Rockies
and northern Plains. Curiously, the GFS model spins up a tropical
system off Cape Cod the evening of August 29. Don't hold your breath.
Map credit: "A global map of the June 2017 LOTI (land-ocean temperature index) anomaly, relative to the 1951-1980 June average."
3 Tornadoes in 3 States, But No Warnings. What Happened? A story at USA TODAY caught my eye: "One
tornado tossed a car like a toy, another reduced buildings to rubble, a
third shredded trees to splinters. Three recent tornadoes hit three
different states — New York, Oklahoma, and Maryland — yet no tornado
warnings were issued before any of the twisters touched down. Do we
have a problem? The National Weather Service, the federal agency that
issues tornado warnings, says no. "There's no headline here," said Greg
Schoor, acting severe weather program leader for the weather service,
noting that they were all separate, unrelated events. "They were three
examples of low-end tornadoes, and are not representative of what's
going on nationally," he said, referring to how well the agency does
with tornado warnings overall..."
Photo credit: "A
tornado that swept through Tulsa, Oklahoma on Sunday injured at least
30 people, and severely damaged many businesses near the city's midtown.
(August 7)." AP
How to Shelter From Fallout After a Nuclear Attack on Your City. Nothing any of us want to contemplate, but under the old Boy Scout motto of "be prepared" here's an excerpt from io9: "Terrorists have detonated a low-yield nuclear warhead in your city. How long should you hide, and where, to avoid the worst effects of radioactive fallout? We talked to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory atmospheric scientist Michael Dillon to find out. Yesterday Dillon published a paper on this topic in the Proceedings of the Royal Society A. He's spent his career researching how the government should respond to disasters with an airborne component, whether that's a chemical accident, an epidemic, or nuclear fallout. After poring over dozens of studies on how fallout behaves, and analyzing as many factors as possible related to urban detonations, he's come up with a disaster plan that he hopes can be implemented by first responders working with governments from the local to the federal level..."
Why 88,000 American Jobs in Solar Energy Are At Risk. TheHill has details: "...Overall job growth in the solar industry is one of the brightest spots in the economy — and smart job growth policy should account for this matured market. Earlier this month, my organization CRES Forum, held a panel discussion to get into the weeds and understand exactly what jobs in the solar industry look like, how the U.S. solar industry is linked to the global economy and why the case before the commission matters. We learned that in 2016, there were over 260,000 jobs in the U.S. solar industry. One in every 50 new jobs created was in the industry, which is growing at 12 times the rate the rest of the economy. And growth in the solar industry is estimated to eventually lead to one million new jobs created across the supply chain through 2050..."
File image: Electrek.
Illustration credit: Jasu Hu.
Illustration credit: Paul Blow.
The Unique Science Experiments Planned for the Eclipse. Atlas Obscura has more interesting background: "...Both
satellites and scientists on Earth will be taking images of the sun’s
corona during the eclipse, but they’ll be capturing more than just
regular visible light. Scientists are interested in X-rays emitted by the sun,
and images of a broad spectrum of light will show its magnetic field.
Telescopes mounted on the noses of two of NASA’s WB-57 jets will try to capture small explosions, called nanoflares, that are believed to help heat up the corona. The telescopes will also take the first thermal images
of Mercury’s surface. In order to get the clearest images, the two jets
will fly along the path of totality at a speed of 470 miles per hour,
and an altitude of 50,000 feet. They’ll only be in the moon’s shadow for
roughly eight minutes, but that’s enough time for the two instruments
to collect valuable data. Another plane, a Gulfstream V owned by the
National Science Foundation and the National Center for Atmospheric
Research, will fly with the eclipse for about four minutes to learn more
about the corona’s thermal structure..."
Photo credit: "The silver nose of this WB-57 jet contains a telescope." NASA’s Johnson Space Center/Norah Moran
TODAY: Heavy showers, T-storms. Winds: SE 8-13. High: 75
WEDNESDAY: Showers and T-storms, locally heavy rain. Low: 63
THURSDAY: Partly sunny, drying out. Winds: NW 7-12. High: 77
FRIDAY: Humid with PM T-storms likely. Winds: SW 7-12. Wake-up: 61. High: 80
SATURDAY: Partly sunny, lake-worthy. Winds: S 5-10. Wake-up: 62. High: 82
SUNDAY: Mix of clouds and hazy sun, warmer. Winds: S 8-13. Wake-up: 64. High: 85
MONDAY: Few showers and T-storms possible. Winds: S 5-10. Wake-up: 66. High: near 80
TUESDAY: More sun, probably a drier day. Winds: NE 5-10. Wake-up: 67. High: 81
Climate Stories...
Case for Climate Change Grows Ever Stronger. Here's the intro of an Op-Ed from the Editorial Board at USA TODAY: "Could
proof grow any more powerful that humanity is responsible for a
dangerously warming planet? Scientists studying Earth's atmosphere and
oceans are finding ever more troubling evidence. Last year was the
hottest on record, according to a report late last week from the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The report, by more
than 450 scientists from 60 nations,
also found that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and global sea
levels are at their highest levels on record. Just as troubling were
draft findings destined for the quadrennial National Climate Assessment.
Scientists from 13 federal agencies found that a rapid rise in
temperatures since the 1980s in the United States represents the warmest period in 1,500 years..."
138 Dormant Volcanoes Under Antarctica's Ice. A story at Quartz made me do a double-take: "...The big question is: how active are these volcanoes? That is something we need to determine as quickly as possible,” Robert Bingham, one of the author’s of the paper told The Guardian. “Anything that causes the melting of ice—which an eruption certainly would—is likely to speed up the flow of ice into the sea.” The connection could work the other way around too, according to Bill McGuire, author of Waking the Giant: How a changing climate triggers earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanoes. Looking at historical records, McGuire said in a previous interview that melting ice caps could cause the Earth’s top layer to “bounce back” and trigger volcanoes..."
Photo credit: "Hidden monsters." (Reuters/Mark Baker).
Explaining the Lack of Rain in Spain (and Italy). The Economist looks at larger forces driving a hotter, drier climate for the Mediterranean: "...Nor, surprisingly, have scientists agreed on whether the intensity and frequency of droughts is increasing in Europe. Against a background of global warming, that might seem inevitable. But since evaporation (from sea, lakes and rivers) and evapotranspiration (from the land) lead to increased rainfall, higher temperatures do not necessarily cause more droughts. Problems do arise if the offsetting rainfall is unevenly distributed—as seems to be the case in Europe. Evidence has mounted over the past 30-odd years of a shift towards wetter winters in northern Europe and, says Mr Vogt, of “drier conditions in the Mediterranean, especially in spring and summer, the critical times of year for drought”. Gregor Gregoric, who co-ordinates the Drought Management Centre for Southeastern Europe, says that since the 1980s that region has suffered a significant drought on average every five years. Even his lush Slovenian homeland has been hit..." (Photo credit: EPA).
The Year Trump Was Elected Was So Hot, It Was 1-in-a-Million. The Guardian explains the odds: "2014, 2015, and 2016 each broke the global temperature record. A new study led by climate scientist Michael Mann just published in Geophysical Research Letters used climate model simulations to examine the odds that these records would have been set in a world with and without human-caused global warming. In model simulations without a human climate influence, the authors concluded:
- There’s a one-in-a-million chance that 2014, 2015, and 2016 would each have been as hot as they were if only natural factors were at play.
- There’s a one-in-10,000 chance that 2014, 2015, and 2016 would all have been record-breaking hot years.
- There’s a less than 0.5% chance of three consecutive record-breaking years happening at any time since 2000..."
No comments:
Post a Comment